Editorial Standards
Last updated
These standards govern everything published on exashard. They exist so you can trust what you read here.
Practitioner-first
Every technical claim is grounded in real engineering experience operating production systems, primarily the TYPEMUSE platform. When we cite a number from our own systems, it is a measured number — never invented. Where we illustrate a concept with a placeholder, we mark it explicitly rather than fabricating data.
Sourcing and accuracy
- We link to primary sources (specifications, papers, official documentation) where relevant.
- We distinguish between what is established, what is our opinion, and what is speculation.
- We state assumptions and the conditions under which our conclusions hold.
Corrections
When we get something wrong, we fix it and note material corrections. To report an error, email [email protected]. We take accuracy seriously and respond to credible corrections promptly.
Monetization separation
exashard is funded by advertising and affiliate partnerships. These never influence our technical conclusions:
- Affiliate links appear only for tools we would actually run in production, and are always disclosed.
- We do not accept payment for favorable coverage.
- Advertising is clearly separated from editorial content.
Authorship and expertise
Articles are written by Colson, an engineer who builds and operates large-scale distributed systems. Author credentials and expertise are published on the About page and attached to each article for transparency (E-E-A-T).
AI and tooling
We may use tooling to assist drafting and research, but every published piece reflects the author’s own engineering judgment and is reviewed for accuracy before publication. The opinions and conclusions are ours.